
# Synthetic Sample Mission — Build a sustainable evidence-learning routine

> Synthetic demonstration only. No patient, employer, credential or private third-party information. Not badge evidence.

## Mission

Create a four-week routine for comparing public professional sources while protecting one recovery evening each week.

## Assess

- Verified source fact: two public source records are available with publisher, version/date and scope.
- User-provided synthetic preference: 45 minutes on Tuesday.
- Constraint: no patient-specific application and no restricted employer policy.
- Assumption: one weekly session is sustainable.
- Unknown: whether the routine remains useful after two weeks.

## Diagnose or Define

The opportunity is to improve source comparison without increasing workload. Likely contributors are scattered notes and an unclear stopping rule. This is not a clinical diagnosis.

## Plan

Compare a 30-minute single-source review with a 45-minute two-source comparison. Choose the smaller reversible plan. Measures: sessions completed, claims with source mapping, unresolved conflicts retained, time spent, burden rating and recovery evening protected. Stop if the plan displaces recovery twice.

## Implement

Create four local tasks, a source-comparison template and a private reflection prompt. Keep AI Setup required unless a real backend is configured. No external message, clinical action or memory addition.

## Evaluate

Synthetic result: three of four sessions completed; all claims mapped; one disagreement retained; average burden acceptable; recovery protected. Decision: revise to three weeks and begin a new Assess cycle. Record that the result is synthetic and proves no competence or patient-care outcome.
